This is the mail archive of the
sgml-tools@via.ecp.fr
mailing list .
Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
- To: sgml-tools at via dot ecp dot fr
- Subject: Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam at onshore dot com>
- Date: 17 May 2000 10:25:26 -0400
- Cc: sano at debian dot org, ldp-discuss at lists dot linuxdoc dot org,gferg at hoop dot timonium dot sgi dot com, dave at lafn dot org, cg at cdegroot dot com,guylhemlistes at free dot fr, gferg at metalab dot unc dot edu,debian-sgml at lists dot debian dot org, JF at linux dot or dot jp
- References: <20000517092453B.kgh12351@kgh12351.nifty.ne.jp> <oaya5aosf0.fsf@arroz.fake> <20000517191121G.kgh12351@kgh12351.nifty.ne.jp>
- Reply-To: sgml-tools at via dot ecp dot fr
Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> writes:
>
> > Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > I have put a source archive of modified sgml-tools 1.0.9
> > > with the name of linuxdoc-tools.
> >
> > Why? Seems like this would cause confusion at this point..
>
> Because I have heard that current sgml-tools v1 & v2 do
> cause the confusion among users / writers in LDP.
>
> I think "sgml-tools" should mean the work provided by Cees,
> and it has been v2, the tools for DocBook.
>
> I am afraid that if I release the new "sgml-tools" 1.0.10,
> or newer version, then users / writers will get into more
> confusion. The bug-fixed version of sgml-tools v1, will
> keep to be the tools for LinuxDoc DTD, so Linuxdoc-Tools
> are better name for it to avoid the confusion, I think.
You have a good point.
> But if you, Adam, or Cees, advise me to use the name of
> "SGML-Tools-V1", then I will follow you.
> Please let me know how I should do.
I don't know what Cees thinks but I'm fine with the rename.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>