This is the mail archive of the
rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the RHUG project.
Re: Should xerces build out of the box?
- To: <rhug-rhats at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Should xerces build out of the box?
- From: Elizabeth Barham <soggytrousers at yahoo dot com>
- Date: 23 Oct 2001 19:47:15 -0500
- Reply-to: lizzy at barjournal dot com
Hi Tom,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> Cool!
:-)
> What version of gcj are you using?
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/2.95.4/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 20011006 (Debian prerelease)
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.0.2/specs
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-linux/3.0.2/../../../libgcj.spec
rename spec lib to liborig
rename spec startfile to startfileorig
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-checking --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm --with-cpp-install-dir=bin --enable-objc-gc powerpc-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.0.2 20011014 (Debian prerelease)
> rhug requires the latest CVS trunk gcc -- what will eventually be
> known as gcc 3.1. This is a pain, because it means you have to build
> your own gcc. However, it is necessary for now. gcj and libgcj are
> still changing quite rapidly. Older releases, even gcj 3.0, are
> noticeably less capable.
That must be the problem then. I'll look into updating.
Thank you,
Elizabeth