Re: RFC: remove old harness

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> I wanted some comments before making this change.  It reports
Tom> test results differently -- each test is a pass/fail rather than each
Tom> check -- so we'll also need to update our nightly scripts.

If the output is vaguely similar ("PASS: foo") then I think all we
need to do is delete our old baselines.

Tom> The new harness is better than the old one in every way, in my
Tom> opinion, so I see no reason in keeping the old one around.

I didn't read the patch or anything, I take your word for it.

Tom> What do people think?

Forward!

Do we need to update the build code in libgcj's test suite?
I think mauve testing there has been broken for a while :(
It would be nice to make that more robust.

Tom