This is the mail archive of the mauve-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the Mauve project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patches for running mauve against wine + win32 vm

From: "Daniel Kegel" <dkegel at google dot com>
To: "Anthony Green" <green at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Steve McKayâ" <smckay at google dot com>, mauve-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:09:58 -0700
Subject: Re: Patches for running mauve against wine + win32 vm
References: <4f2ee4520708031409o723d606bx78689a245f9fb5ef@mail.gmail.com> <4f2ee4520708271300x38b4a036r201cb5ab92429c00@mail.gmail.com> <545d88bc0708271740xbfb0ad5rbdf8d4877ff16f2d@mail.gmail.com> <46D42F38.8030100@redhat.com>

On 8/28/07, Anthony Green <green@redhat.com> wrote:
> Daniel Kegel wrote:
> > It turns out this might not be such a good idea after all
> > for those tests which time out,
>
> Are you saying that you not want these patches applied?  I don't see
> anything in here related to timeouts.

The patches are ok.  It's just that the whole concept of running
the harness in Linux and the tests in Wine is a little iffy,
since when a test times out, the Linux kill command makes
the Wine JVM unhappy.  Wine JVMs prefer to be killed by Windows kill commands.
- Dan

References:
- Fwd: Patches for running mauve against wine + win32 vm
  - From: Steve McKayâ
- Re: Patches for running mauve against wine + win32 vm
  - From: Daniel Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]