This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Mauve project.
Re: Mauve license
Stuart Ballard writes:
> Even RMS points out that using non-copyleft licenses can be beneficial
> when it's a net gain for Free Software as a whole (eg Ogg).
> And in this case I think there is such a gain, because the GPL is
> buying us nothing (since there's no practical reason why anyone would
> *want* to take Mauve proprietary)
Oh, I see your meaning.
> but costing us contributors.
This part is the mystery. If, as you say, there's no practical reason
why anyone would *want* to take Mauve proprietary, why does it matter
that Mauve is GPL?
> I seem to be in a minority though, so I'll drop the issue I guess.
It's not that. I just don't understand.