Re: Patch: GUI testing framework

[Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2005 17:39 schrieb Thomas Fitzsimmons:
> > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 10:02 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2005 00:36 schrieb Thomas Fitzsimmons:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds support to batch_run for running GUI tests,
> > > > either within an Xvfb server (default) or directly on the
> > > > tester's desktop.  It also introduces the GUI tag; all tests
> > > > that require DISPLAY to be set should be tagged as GUI tests.
> > > >
> > > > I tested this with the java.awt.Robot tests I posted last week.
> > > > The tests run properly both within Xvfb and on my desktop.
> > >
> > > Nice. Classpath has it now too, so we can generally test it too
> > > directly.
> > >
> > > > I would like to rely on the metacity window manager, since it
> > > > handles inset sizing correctly.
> > >
> > > Depending on a specific window manager is stupid. It just makes
> > > the hurdles for users of mauve higher. If we have problems with a
> > > specific window manager and its his fault and not ours we should
> > > report bugs.
> >
> > OK.  Can we default to metacity?  I'm thinking of:
> >
> > if test "x$WM" = "x" ; then
> >     WM=metacity
> > fi
> >
> > Then you could set WM on the command line.
> 
> Why do you need the window manager at all ? Where does the $WM value 
> get used ?
> 

You don't need a window manager, but having one makes for a more
realistic testing environment.  With the patch I just posted, you can
set WM=/bin/true to run without a window manager.

Tom