This is the mail archive of the mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Mauve project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Mauve patches.

From: Thomas Zander <zander at javalobby dot org>
To: mauve-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Cc: "David Lichteblau" <dave at lichteblau dot com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:19:14 +0200
Subject: Re: Mauve patches.
References: <200404060956.14298.zander@javalobby.org> <200404110848.06673.zander@javalobby.org> <20040411122255.GC21097@lichteblau.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 11 April 2004 14:22, David Lichteblau wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Zander (zander@javalobby.org):
> > I hope you'll agree that its more important to have people creating
> > patches and moving the project forward then to always have a 100%
> > correct CVS. (problems can be fixed post-commit)
>
> No!

David; I have not seen you before; an introduction might be in place.
After we found out what your part in Mauve is; would you care to elaborate 
on your position?
I'm assuming we all want the best java test suite there is; and in my 
experience the project is moving forward too slow to get that to happen. 
Instead of just shouting 'no!' an alternative solution is always welcome.

Thanx.

- -- 
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAeX4ZCojCW6H2z/QRAtPDAJ9UsFw4/Rt4SKHlAbLVOMOnAGyE8QCgjLMP
S6M2ClKX4exsFt8aTu6HfG8=
=Ol2e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mauve patches.
  - From: David Lichteblau

References:
- Mauve patches.
  - From: Thomas
- Re: Mauve patches.
  - From: Thomas Zander
- Re: Mauve patches.
  - From: David Lichteblau

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]