This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Mauve project.
Re: New java.lang.Thread tests
Mark> I didn't need it for the join() but I needed it since I wanted
Mark> to notify() the Thread object. The join() just happened to be
Mark> included in the synchronized block by accident. See the diff
Mark> between the original isAlive test and the new one.
Mark> But if people agree that the original code also is legal then I
Mark> can add an extra test for that case.
I don't see a problem with it offhand.