This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [PATCH] am33: bring port up to date with NPTL support
- From: Mark Salter <msalter at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 18:40:51 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] am33: bring port up to date with NPTL support
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1340030785-32581-1-git-send-email-msalter at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401212249560 dot 25161 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 22:53 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Any news on updating this patch for my review comments posted in June
> 2012, and for all the subsequent relevant global changes in glibc for
> which the port wasn't updated (or for which new files in the patch need
> updating), with a view to getting it checked in so a further review of how
> current the port is regarding global changes can be made on the basis of a
> substantially working checked-in port? I really don't think it makes
> sense just to leave the port around in such a bit-rotten state; either it
> should be fixed, or it should be removed from glibc (with of course the
> potential to add a port to this architecture again in future if one is
> posted that is up-to-date with current glibc).
Sorry about letting this linger. At this point, I think removing it is
the thing to do. The tls bits never got to upstream gcc and I ran into
issues with the toolchain I couldn't get past.