This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
Cc: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:24:18 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
References: <CANLjY-kZ6FakmtKkHjjC2YNgCBkydiNq8F81Fb7SgW0RE6iF5w@mail.gmail.com> <CANLjY-=unqAnKAa6jpyvYo1N8-xEQJM0DMXKi8i2NUfxjMG-vw@mail.gmail.com> <4FBDEE02.9000402@redhat.com> <201205242028.12654.vapier@gentoo.org>

On 05/25/2012 01:28 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 24 May 2012 04:14:58 Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 05/23/2012 10:11 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
>>> My concern is that a point release of GCC would stop working against the latest release of GLIBC.
>> 
>> Can't we put the compatibility symlink into the official glibc codebase?
> 
> i don't think that makes much sense.  the old ldso name is the official EABI/softfp name.  that it was used by some people for EABI/hardfp is unfortunate, but the few that do want to support compatibility with that configuration should carry it themselves.

Fair enough.

Andrew.

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Michael Hope
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]