This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: glibc build problem...
- From: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com>
- To: Oliver Falk <oliver at linux-kernel dot at>
- Cc: Jay Estabrook <jay dot estabrook at gmail dot com>, Michael Kronsteiner <alphamike at gmx dot at>, Tero Huttunen <tero dot huttunen at saunalahti dot fi>, ink at jurassic dot park dot msu dot ru, rth at twiddle dot net, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:19:38 +0000
- Subject: Re: glibc build problem...
- References: <4D2D66CF.5000802@linux-kernel.at> <4D2D698B.5000505@linux-kernel.at> <4D2DC92B.3040907@gmail.com> <4D2EBC86.70501@linux-kernel.at> <1294910422.2305.15.camel@localhost> <4D2ECC0D.3010600@linux-kernel.at> <AANLkTi=gO95eLu5n9QE_d_hDYRxG4wL==rheAARmBbev@mail.gmail.com> <4D2EFBFB.6090406@linux-kernel.at> <AANLkTimfjM8htzu6=SKBNa-E-qZCBn3Yxh3DBNMOYD5L@mail.gmail.com> <4D2F2262.8010800@gmail.com> <4D35D03C.2040008@linux-kernel.at>
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Oliver Falk <oliver@linux-kernel.at> wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> Sorry for directly mailing you... But m/l don't work for me ATM.
Added libc-ports@ for you. There's no reason not to mail it.
> stubs.c: In function '__setfpucw':
> stubs.c:47: warning: implicit declaration of function '_FPU_SETCW'
> stubs.c: In function '__setfpucw':
> stubs.c:47: warning: implicit declaration of function '_FPU_SETCW'
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.11.2/build-alpha-linuxnptl/glibc-compat/libNoVersion_pic.a(stubs.os):
> In function `__setfpucw':
> /data/work/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.11.2/glibc-compat/stubs.c:47: undefined
> reference to `_FPU_SETCW'
> /data/work/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.11.2/glibc-compat/stubs.c:47: undefined
> reference to `_FPU_SETCW'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: ***
> [/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.11.2/build-alpha-linuxnptl/glibc-compat/libNoVersion.so]
> Error 1
>
>
> Ideas?
>
> On other archs it's defined as some __asm__ volatile code... Actually not
> the stuff I'm able to do...
>
> -of
>
Lots of alpha patches went into glibc-2.12. Try that before you spend
too much time trying to compile an older version.
Matt