This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[ARM] {OABI, EABI} x {LinuxThreads, NPTL} (was: Breaking ARM's mcount implementations into a separate file)


Hello!

While we're at that -- another question: what's the general policy on
keeping ARM's OABI and LinuxThreads code up to date that is still present
in the repository?  Obviously it needs time to maintain / enhace these
code paths when doing changes to EABI / NPTL code -- but are these
changes at all used by anyone, or is it in fact wasted time?  Let alone
the difficulty with testing such changes.  Should maybe even the OABI and
LinuxThread code blocks / files be removed from the repository?


Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]