This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: glibc-ports-2.11
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: ams at gnu dot org
- Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo at gnu dot org>, joseph at codesourcery dot com, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:51:10 -0500
- Subject: Re: glibc-ports-2.11
- References: <20091102035358.E10BF2A0C@magilla.sf.frob.com> <200911051840.27858.vapier@gentoo.org> <E1N6KBA-0000a0-Qn@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1N7AWf-00013A-BE@fencepost.gnu.org> <87aay827rb.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911262345290.13170@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <87638wib1r.fsf@gnu.org> <E1NF93s-0006n2-BP@fencepost.gnu.org> <119aab440912011649k4572dc9cj8aeb0ac72cf53b0f@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
>> ? > Did you miss <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-11/msg00064.html>?
>>
>> ? Excellent. ?Is someone planning to upload a tarball?
>>
>> Yes, I have been without network access, please have patience. ?There
>> should be a tarball on gnu.org and sourceware when you read this.
>
> Are the glibc and glibc-ports tarballs in place now? Should I update
> both websites to reflect the switch to 2.11?
I see tarballs for both, so I'll go ahead and update the websites.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Carlos.