This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: Glibc release check-list
- From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams at gnu dot org>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- Cc: dan at codesourcery dot com, schwab at linux-m68k dot org, pasky at suse dot cz, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:44:40 -0500
- Subject: Re: Glibc release check-list
- References: <20091113142845.GS3708@machine.or.cz> <119aab440911130700y3e00672cwfa2c679de89a3eb5@mail.gmail.com> <E1N9FaZ-0008HI-A6@fencepost.gnu.org> <119aab440911140842u39c5967k9fd8a820cfce49ab@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: ams at gnu dot org
Should the ports maintainers have a pow-wow to decide who gets to do
the honours and when?
I think that ports releases should be done in sync with glibc. Users
will become immensly confused if you have glibc-ports-2.42 that is to
be used with glibc 2.11.