This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [M68K/ColdFire patch 4/n] Remove kernel headers

Andreas Schwab wrote:
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com> writes:

For m68k the change is close to no-op, both kernel and GLIBC headers
define the structures to be the same.


No.  The SysV version of ucontext_t does not match the kernel definition
in any way.

I'm afraid I don't follow you here. From your words I get the idea that the difference between linux definition of ucontext_t and GLIBC's is intentional. What I don't understand is how things are supposed to work then.

The ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/sys/ucontext.h file does indeed describe the SysV version of ucontext_t, not that of linux's. But why it isn't in ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/m68k/sys/ directory then?

--
Maxim

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]