This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: GLIBC PowerPC CPU tuned addon V0.1
- From: "Lior Balkohen" <balkohen at gmail dot com>
- To: libc-ports at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:33:26 +0200
- Subject: Re: GLIBC PowerPC CPU tuned addon V0.1
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MnOcqPxURN/xBTVRviEMwvIS+i+gYQ2HipzShBvVOyAwNJHGwmcZXyxI4uWF+eLP+iGPtcDpO+JGekSgz/l+VMSVxIe+94bm8YZz/QuDqwy5M22PcyVqbpunCMHiJA0hkMyyyBYLSRKAyOnatU1vKS6c73HZnWS8pylliHJd9Lo=
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4447A78F.firstname.lastname@example.org>
2006/4/20, Steven Munroe <email@example.com>:
> What about 405fp anf 440fp?. For example you could put all the
> integer/string code in ./powerpc32/440 and create a ./powerpc32/440fp/
> which contains an Impiles file that refers back to ./powerpc32/440/. Of
> course any 440fp float code would go in ./powerpc32/440fp/fpu. This
> would allow some testing of the configurarion and if you have 440fp
> hardware "make check" some of the code.
> >Probably I have to wait until it's fixed.
> Nofpu support for long double on my list, but higher priority work has
> pushed it back. It will be a few weeks.
OK, I'll give it a try within the next few days...
P.S.: Steven, probably only I got your answer because you CCed to
"firstname.lastname@example.org" but the correct mailing list address is