This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/21547] Tibetan script collation broken (Dzongkha and Tibetan)


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21547

--- Comment #25 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Elie Roux from comment #24)
> That's really great, thank you so much! Is it possible to have the exact
> same collation rules for the bo locale(s)? bo, bo_IN and bo_CN

Yes, I did this:

$ grep -A3 ^LC_COLLATE dz_* bo_*
dz_BT:LC_COLLATE
dz_BT-% Using the rules.txt attached to:
dz_BT-% http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/9895
dz_BT-% See also: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21547
--
bo_CN:LC_COLLATE
bo_CN-copy "dz_BT"
bo_CN-END LC_COLLATE
bo_CN-
--
bo_IN:LC_COLLATE
bo_IN-copy "bo_CN"
bo_IN-END LC_COLLATE
bo_IN-

So dz_BT implements the rules and bo_CN and bo_IN just copy them.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]