This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/1015] be_BY@tarask: new locale
- From: "digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:41:47 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] be_BY@tarask: new locale
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1015-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015
Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
--- Comment #31 from Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com> ---
Thank you Mike and Chris for replying while I was traveling. Indeed, we feel
more comfortable to add or modify locale data if they are copied from CLDR.
Actually our long term goal is to import locale data from CLDR automatically.
Adding locales which are not present in CLDR is possible but always tricky: how
to verify if a locale is correct? how to tell if a community willing to use the
locale really exists? In this case I was told that it does not exist.
So, Hleb, please prove that the community (at least one person) exists and file
a ticket asking to add the locale to CLDR. I suggest to add this locale to
glibc (that means: I or someone else will add) as soon as it draws some
reasonable attention from CLDR maintainers. I don't need to wait until it is
closed and published. For now I reopen this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.