This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][BZ 18934] hu_HU: Fix multiple sorting bugs.


Hi Carlos,

Any news on this one?

In the mean time I'd like to confirm that the unittests still pass as
of the brand new Unicode 9.0 commit.

cheers,
egmont

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 01:02 PM, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Here's the Wednesday ping you requested :)
>
> Thanks, I'll schedule this in for my Thursday reviews.
>
> Cheers,
> Carlos.
>
>> thanks,
>> egmont
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 02/09/2017 05:19 PM, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
>>>> Carlos, any news?
>>>>
>>>> Did Luis's and my comment help you move forward?
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to emphasize again that my patch does not do anythinig
>>>> serious. No big redesign, no fundamental change, nothing like this.
>>>> The things Luis mentioned were either already implemented that way, or
>>>> I did not touch them. It's just a few, technically small bugfixes that
>>>> I made. Really nothing big deal. Plus unittests.
>>>>
>>>> I have, a long time ago, offered that I can turn this all-in-one patch
>>>> into like 4-5 patches to be applied on top of each other. But then
>>>> they'd have to be reviewed and applied in a particular order (because
>>>> they'd heavily conflict) at once. I know that generally this is the
>>>> preferred approach, however, it cannot work together with test driven
>>>> development since there's no way to test the intermediate (i.e.
>>>> deliberately still broken) states. Having chosen TDD, the result of my
>>>> work was a patch that fixes all the referred bugs in a single step. I
>>>> can, I still offer to spend some more time on it to create a few
>>>> smaller, easier to review patches *if* seriously that is what's
>>>> missing from getting my work accepted. Let me know.
>>>
>>> I think your patch is ready to go, but we need a senior person with
>>> commit privileges to review and check it in.
>>>
>>> Please ping me again next week on Wednesday and I'll arrange to try
>>> test and checkin on Thursday.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Carlos.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]