This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: [Bug localedata/14095] Review / update collation data from Unicode / ISO 14651
- From: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- To: joseph at codesourcery dot com <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 09:57:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Bug localedata/14095] Review / update collation data from Unicode / ISO 14651
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <bug-14095-716 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/> <bug-14095-716-faoOQwi1dE at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:03:54PM +0000, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14095
>
> --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, keld at keldix dot com wrote:
>
> > I am willing to contribute with a look on the different issues.
>
> That would be very helpful, thanks! The first question would probably be
> where the original iso14651_t1 file (added in commit
> b0a3e2e6238f4846bc7a99145d2721b8d5b5ec31 in the history repository) came
> from; if we can reproduce it from old ISO 14651 data, we can hopefully
> build a corresponding file from current ISO 14651 data - and then start to
> understand, for all the changes made to the data over the past 15 years,
> which of them are still relevant and desirable given current ISO 14651 /
> Unicode data as a base, and what the right way is to handle those changes.
It is my plan to work with the editor of 14651 on making the 14651
data directly useable with glibc. This is not currently the case
and we know it.
Keld