Re: Correct glibc locale hr_HR?

[Petter Reinholdtsen <pere at hungry dot com>]

[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> With the current locale, it prints this output:
> 
>   'Kn 1 234,45'
>   '-Kn 1 234,45'
>   'HRK 1 234,45'
>   '-HRK 1 234,45'
> 
> Is this the correct output?  The report I saw, claimed that the output
> should look like this instead:
> 
>   '1 234,56 Kn'
>   '-1 234,56 Kn'
>   'HRK 1 1234,56'
>   '-HRK 1 234,56'

Gah, forget this question.  I just discovered that you provided an
answer on the libc-alpha mailing list 2004-01-24.

There you provided 

>   123.45        123,45 Kn        HRK 123,45
>   -123.45       -123,45 Kn       HRK -123,45
>   123456.78     123 456,78 Kn    HRK 123 456,78
>   -123456.78    -123 456,78 Kn   HRK -123 456,78

as the correct formatting.


> If the current format is wrong, please report a bug into the glibc
> bugzilla, with examples of the correct formats (or a patch to fix
> the locale).

This is still the case.  The bug should be reported into
<URL:http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/>, to make sure it isn't
forgotten.  And it is better if a native-speaker report the problem.
Do you have time to report it?