Re: Multiple definition of __libc_multiple_libcs

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On Saturday 21 April 2012 23:19:23 P. J. McDermott wrote:
> Trying to cross build EGLIBC 2.15

again, same answer as before -- we can't keep track of all the patches that 
are in there different from glibc-2.15.  why don't you just use glibc instead ?

>   arm-cortex_a8-linux-gnueabi-gcc   -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o <build
>   >/elf/librtld.map.o '-Wl,-(' <build>/elf/dl-allobjs.os <build>/libc_pi
>   c.a -lgcc '-Wl,-)' -Wl,-Map,<build>/elf/librtld.mapT
>   <build>/libc_pic.a(init-first.os):(.data+0x0): multiple definition of
>   `__libc_multiple_libcs'
>   <build>/elf/dl-allobjs.os:(.bss+0x9c): first defined here
>   collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

this is a generic error.  you should look at the .map file produced and trace 
back why the extra objects are getting included.  i'm not aware of an easier 
way than that.  some common reasons are the toolchain implicitly enables SSP 
or other hardened options that end up causing more objects than normal to get 
pulled in.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.