This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I still see these warnings and would like to help getting them fixed. Richard, what do you suggest is the best thing to do? Andreas Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes: > Let's look closer at one example: > ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_isinf.c:29: warning: âisinfâ aliased to undefined symbol â__isinfâ > > The function is: > > int > __isinf (double x) > { > int32_t hx,lx; > EXTRACT_WORDS(hx,lx,x); > lx |= (hx & 0x7fffffff) ^ 0x7ff00000; > lx |= -lx; > return ~(lx >> 31) & (hx >> 30); > } > hidden_def (__isinf) > weak_alias (__isinf, isinf) > > And the warning appears for the weak_alias. If I change it to: > weak_alias (__GI___isinf, isinf) > > Everything is fine. > > so, is this the right way to do - and should we add a new macro, e.g. > hidden_weak_alias to use in place of weak_alias above? > > Or how should this be solved to make GCC happy - and be convenienent > for glibc? > > Andreas Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |