This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Let's look closer at one example: ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_isinf.c:29: warning: âisinfâ aliased to undefined symbol â__isinfâ The function is: int __isinf (double x) { int32_t hx,lx; EXTRACT_WORDS(hx,lx,x); lx |= (hx & 0x7fffffff) ^ 0x7ff00000; lx |= -lx; return ~(lx >> 31) & (hx >> 30); } hidden_def (__isinf) weak_alias (__isinf, isinf) And the warning appears for the weak_alias. If I change it to: weak_alias (__GI___isinf, isinf) Everything is fine. so, is this the right way to do - and should we add a new macro, e.g. hidden_weak_alias to use in place of weak_alias above? Or how should this be solved to make GCC happy - and be convenienent for glibc? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 NÃrnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |