This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: second thoughts on using dl_iterate_phdr() for cache-validation

From: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
To: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
Cc: libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 20:40:15 -0800
Subject: Re: second thoughts on using dl_iterate_phdr() for cache-validation

> >>>>> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 18:32:18 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> said:
> 
>   Roland> For platforms where it doesn't work, you can use nonblocking
>   Roland> synchronization a la seqcount.
> 
> Are you referring to the Linux kernel seqlock or something else?

I was referring to the Linux kernel's "seqcount" macros, as an example of
the well-known technique.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: second thoughts on using dl_iterate_phdr() for cache-validation
  - From: David Mosberger

References:
- Re: second thoughts on using dl_iterate_phdr() for cache-validation
  - From: David Mosberger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]