This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Only use -z relro if it actually does something

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 09:12:55AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 05:57:01PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:54:33AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 03:24:53PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > On ia64 ATM -z relro does nothing (but increase the size of program
> > > > headers).
> > > > H.J. disabled it because it interferred with linker relaxation
> > > > (not sure if that still applies or what the testcase was).
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Can you point it to my change? I may recall something.
> > 
> > 2003-05-15  H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> > 
> > 	* emulparams/elf64_ia64.sh: Don't set COMMONPAGESIZE for now.
> > 
> 
> Thanks. I opened a binutils bug
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=393
> 
> to track it. I will check it out.
> 

I have verified that gcc 3.3 still needs my patch. I closed the bug
with results for gcc 3.2 Red Hat, gcc 3.3, gcc 3.4 and gcc 4.0.


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]