This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add FTW_ACTIONRETVAL flag to nftw{,64}

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>, Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:01:41 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add FTW_ACTIONRETVAL flag to nftw{,64}
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <20031107151917.GH12344@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> POSIX doesn't explicitely list EINVAL, do I have to silently
> ignore it instead?

It is perfectly alright to add new error values.  Especially since a
non-standard feature (the new falg) has to be used to trigger it.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/q+wV2ijCOnn/RHQRAtoWAKC6YX20Ralupx/Ov7ORWoso/3XjOgCfQahL
+cg5Afwed4tmqgdoCJCQQK4=
=G2Wx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- [PATCH] Add FTW_ACTIONRETVAL flag to nftw{,64}
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]