This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix futimes (was Re: utimes())

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:27:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix futimes (was Re: utimes())
References: <20030731122612.GA620@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au><20030731124735.GD20507@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><20030731134306.GA19853@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au><20030731140430.GG20507@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

|> The question is what is utimes/futimes supposed to do if
|> tv_usec > 999999.

I can't find any requirement that the argument must be normalized, so
IMHO utimes should cope.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] Fix utimes and futimes (take 2)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [PATCH] Fix futimes (was Re: utimes())
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]