This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:27:36 -0700, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> said: Uli> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Uli> David Mosberger wrote: >> - gdb never had any problems with libunwind itself (it was >> initially released under GPL, now it's even under the MIT license >> so that the *BSD folks can use it for their kernel) Uli> That's not enough. The code has to be assigned to the FSF. libunwind is not part of gdb, so I don't see why it would need an assignment. Uli> But all this is pointless. If anything should change it's Uli> ia64. There was no reason to invent something new but still it Uli> was done. For no good reason. That sounds like a lot of sour grapes. I don't know the history behind the ABI work, but changing it now sure seems like a bit late... ;-) In any case, are you worried at all about dynamically generated code? If so, how are you planning to handle that? --david
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |