This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:19:36 +0100
Subject: Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
References: <OF7A1254A6.6C7E2F35-ONC1256CC9.00440502@de.ibm.com>

"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> writes:

|> > Do you have a pointer to the patch?  Is this fixed in the 3.3 branch?
|> 
|> Uli says that the binds_local_p fix is part of the TLS patch. Do you
|> need a patch that just fixes the binds_local_p problem or can you live
|> with the TLS patch as it is?

IMHO there should be a configure test and PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN only be
enabled when it works.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]