This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 11:12:13 +0100
Subject: Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
References: <OFA261B638.DAE9680D-ONC1256CC6.003091BD@de.ibm.com>

"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> writes:

|> > > I've used gcc 3.3-CVS, binutils 2.13.90.0.18.
|> >
|> > Getting closer. gcc 3.3 accesses _rtld_local via the GOT
|> > although it is declared as hidden.
|> 
|> Asked our compiler-man and Uli said that there has been a problem
|> in gcc 3.3 with local binding of symbols. This was fixed some time
|> ago. An update of gcc should help.

Do you have a pointer to the patch?  Is this fixed in the 3.3 branch?

Thanks, Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- Re: PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN does not work on s390[x]
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]