This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes: > > |> On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:47, Andreas Schwab wrote: > |> > +compat_symbol (libc, __umoddi3, __umoddi3, GLIBC_2_0); > |> > |> Shouldn't that be GLIBC_2.0 (. not _)? > > No, this must be a valid identifier, which is translated via > abi-versions.h into the actual version (which might not be GLIBC_2.0 after > all). It's a wrapper around symbol_version. > > |> I also wonder why you didn't wrap it with a SHLIB_COMPAT? > > I'm not sure whether it is needed. If you don't use SHLIB_COMPAT, you will compile in unexported dead code on a configuration that doesn't need to support GLIBC_2.0.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |