This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch to make init_array work (2nd version; resend)

From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
Cc: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com, libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:38:56 -0800
Subject: Re: patch to make init_array work (2nd version; resend)
References: <200211081934.gA8JYVB05781@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com

>>>>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:34:31 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> said:

  Roland> When this approach came up before, Ulrich also objected to
  Roland> the implementation, see
  Roland> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2002-03/msg00063.html.
  Roland> In future repostings of patches previously discussed, it
  Roland> would be helpful if you could cite the prior posting and
  Roland> discussion in the mailing list archives, for the benefit of
  Roland> people like me who were not involved in the discussion the
  Roland> first time around.

Yes, though I did point to the thread earlier on
(see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-10/msg00085.html).

  Roland> That suggested approach is not available for static linking,
  Roland> however.

Right.

  Roland> I am inclined to think the plan we discussed yesterday is
  Roland> the best one.

I like it, too.

	--david

References:
- Re: patch to make init_array work (2nd version; resend)
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]