This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
>>>>> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:29:24 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> said: >> Perhaps, but it would defeat the whole purpose of switching to >> init_array (see my previous mail about why any call in >> .init/.fini causes incorrect unwind info). Roland> Since this part of the section is generated normally along Roland> with the prologue, I would think that its unwind info would Roland> come out normally too. For .init, wouldn't the new code have to go into the epilogue to ensure that the .init_array entries are called after .init? --david
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |