This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: separately compiling libc modules for rtld

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:26:46 +0200
Subject: Re: separately compiling libc modules for rtld
References: <3D994F6A.8060709@redhat.com> <200210010825.g918P6E10682@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:25:06AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I know that Hurd has problems.  But exported symbols temporarily should
> > be able to fix that, right?  And it also doesn't introduce any permanent
> > ABI damage.  So I'd rather go this way unless you prefer to not change
> > the code and declare 2.3.1 as the first release usable for Hurd.
> 
> That would be ok with me, but it might be hard for the Debian/Hurd guys.
> 
> There is never any question of ABI breakage that I know of, just that it
> works or it doesn't or it has too many PLT entries and is less optimal.  
> It seems to me the simplest thing for now would be to make it easy to just
> disable all the hidden_proto stuff entirely and have Hurd do that.  
> I'll add something.

Yeah, I think a simple libc-symbols.h change is best for 2.3.

	Jakub

References:
- Re: separately compiling libc modules for rtld
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: separately compiling libc modules for rtld
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]