This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: "defined but not used" warning for .gnu.warning symbols

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>
Cc: GNU libc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 28 Apr 2002 14:24:12 -0700
Subject: Re: "defined but not used" warning for .gnu.warning symbols
References: <20020428195431.8B9EB1BA15@perdition.linnaean.org>

On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 12:54, Roland McGrath wrote:

> Should we add the `unused' attribute to the symbol?  Is there something
> that guarantees us gcc won't optimize out these defns entirely?

Probably.  If that actually helps, that is.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "defined but not used" warning for .gnu.warning symbols
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- "defined but not used" warning for .gnu.warning symbols
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]