This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Updated glibc-gcc3.patch

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> If __register_frame_info and similar registry is not present in
> glibc, this means all shared libs have to be linked against -lgcc_s

Anad this is how it has to be.  Otherwise the whole conceot of
libgcc_s is wrong and then you'll have to convince the gcc people.
glibc is not there to work around such decisions.

> But what I'm worried more is the GCC_3.0 vs. GLIBC_2.2.5 thing which
> basically render this glibc change useless.

Show me examples.  Code.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]