This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:00:06AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > > > This is what I had to add yesterday: it is perfectly normal to have > > different osversions for one soname in the same library (say have > > libc-2.2.1.so and libc-2.2.2.so in the same directory), we just must update > > osversion from the library ld.so.cache will actually contain. > > I've applied this patch as well. Thanks, BTW: Could you please also look at: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-03/msg00009.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-02/msg00132.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-02/msg00128.html and either send me your objections against them or apply them? Thanks. Jakub
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |