This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Mark Brown <bmark@us.ibm.com> writes: > However, this statement has not been retracted or questioned in > 1003.1-1996 or anywhere else -- the intent is that an aio_fsync() > happens right when you ask for it, I guess. This would be stupid and in general cannot be implemented this way. If there is a request for the file descriptor running, why should it's progress be hindered by processing the aio_fsync immediately? Also, if this would be the right interpretation, why should this function exist since it's obviously the same as a simple fsync() call? -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |