This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Adding SH support to glibc-2.2 (2)

kaz Kojima wrote:
 > >  - you don't want to unify the size of the setjmp buffer?  Even if the
 > >    SH3 has no FPU the room can be reserved and so more compatibility
 > >    among the platforms can give achieved.
 > 
 > Sure. We should unify it for the kernel math emulation, for example.
 > Niibe-san, do you have any opinion about this?

Note that Ulrich says about the size, not the implementations of
setjmp/longjmp.

I agree Ulrich.  We can unify the _size_ of the setjump buffer, it's
the way to go.  When someone will implement kernel math emulation for
SH-3, he could use the reserved fields with his implementation of
setjmp/longjmp.
--
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]