This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
The license in the libio subdirectory is different from the licence in the rest of glibc. glibc uses the LGPL everywhere except in the libio subdirectory where most (not all) files have the following copyright: /* Copyright (C) 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This file is part of the GNU IO Library. This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version. This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this library; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. As a special exception, if you link this library with files compiled with a GNU compiler to produce an executable, this does not cause the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License. This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License. */ Please note that this is the GPL (not LGPL) and note also the last paragraph where it speaks about a "GNU compiler". This implies that I'm not allowed to use any other compiler beside gcc [1]. At first sight I consider this is a real problem for using glibc2. Are my observations ok? Please correct me and clarify the situation. Thanks, Andreas Footnotes: [1] We could even discuss whether egcs is really a GNU compiler but with the recent developments (egcs taking over gcc) this would be really academically. -- Andreas Jaeger aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de for pgp-key finger ajaeger@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |