This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Locales: Use CLDR matching thousands separator


21.08.2018 04:18 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/17/2018 03:01 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > 16.08.2018 11:28 Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> [...] But of course going back and forth on the glibc side is not ideal
> >> if CLDR does the change some time in the future.
> >
> > That's my reason to oppose against this change but my opposition is weak.
> > That means, if other people want to introduce this change I will not
> > oppose anymore.
>
> This is called an objection, the strong form is called a sustained objection.
>
> Only sustained objection would block consensus on accepting a patch.

Thank you for explaining.  Yes, I have an objection.

> So it sounds like you don't have a sustained objection, you're just worried
> about the changes causing confusion to our users,

More or less, that's true.

> and I agree that could be
> a problem, but being out of sync with CLDR is also a problem.

I did not know it was a problem.  We were talking many times about the automatic
scripts to feed data from CLDR but we don't have any.  Therefore I thought it
is good to follow CLDR but not a big problem if we don't follow CLDR for some
good reasons.

Of course, I don't express any objection against following CLDR.

> Your objection
> is recorded here.

Thank you.

[ cut the rest of the message as it does not seem to be directed to me. ]

Regards,

Rafal


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]