This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net>
- To: javier--CbphpPOVok9WFxGWvC7CbkqlsxDZyT at jasp dot net
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, 888073 at bugs dot debian dot org, 889106 at bugs dot debian dot org
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 16:03:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1517756479.29018.96.camel@sempati.menos4> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802051644140.4209@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <1517853521.21342.182.camel@sempati.menos4> <1517878529.21342.216.camel@sempati.menos4> <20180209140225.GC2428@aurel32.net> <1518186012.12525.44.camel@sempati.menos4>
On 2018-02-09 15:20, Javier Serrano Polo wrote:
> El dv 09 de 02 de 2018 a les 15:02 +0100, Aurelien Jarno va escriure:
> > The notion of "multiarch interpreter" doesn't exist.
>
> It does exist, but you do not accept it. You are now denying the
> official support that exists in Debian.
I love the way you use "official" here.
> Use /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 as the program
> interpreter and the program will work perfectly in Debian and
> derivatives.
I don't care about compatibility within Debian and derivatives. I care
about the compatibility within the whole GNU/Linux ecosystem.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net