Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures

[Javier Serrano Polo <javier at jasp dot net>]

El dv 09 de 02 de 2018 a les 14:34 +0000, Joseph Myers va escriure:
> Doing so is just as incorrect as using /lib64/ld-2.27.so as the 
> interpreter name.

/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 is guaranteed to exist in
Debian; /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.24.so is not.

> I think your present advocacy is an effective argument *against* any 
> additions to multiarch support in the GNU toolchain.

My ability to implement multiarch solutions, just like I did in the
past, is an argument in favor. Your inability to provide interpreter
names that solve file conflicts in multiarch systems is a proof of your
competence about this matter.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature