This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Dear list, Multiarch systems allow to run programs from other architectures. ELF executables for traditional architectures depend on interpreter names that may conflict with each other. For instance, it is complicated to run alpha programs on x86 systems. Simpler systems use multiarch interpreter names. I am looking for consensus since I would like to avoid, e.g., having ld-linux-i386.so.2, ld-linux-i686.so.2, ld-linux-x86.so.2, and ld-linux-x86-32.so.2 for x86. What would be the proper multiarch names for the following architectures? I present suggestions: alpha ld-linux-alpha.so.2 arm,soft-float,LE ld-linux-armsfle.so.3 hppa ld-linux-hppa.so.1 m68k ld-linux-m68k.so.1 mips,classic NaN,o32,BE ld-linux-mips.so.1 mips,classic NaN,o32,LE ld-linux-mipsle.so.1 mips,classic NaN,n64,LE ld-linux-mips64le.so.1 powerpc,32-bit ld-linux-powerpc.so.1 powerpc SPE ld-linux-powerpcspe.so.1 powerpc,64-bit,BE ld-linux-powerpc64.so.1 powerpc,64-bit,LE ld-linux-powerpc64le.so.2 s390,64-bit ld-linux-s390-64.so.1 sh,SH4 ld-linux-sh4.so.2 sparc,64-bit ld-linux-sparc64.so.2 x86 ld-linux-x86.so.2 hurd,x86 ld-hurd-x86.so.1 kfreebsd,x86 ld-kfreebsd-x86.so.1 Thank you.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |