This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ULP update for alpha/hppa (was [PATCH] Sparc ulp update)


On 01/26/2018 09:43 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-01-26 13:11, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> David, will you be committing this patch 
>>> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-01/msg00744.html> before the 
>>> release?
>>
>> From what I can see from the Debian build logs (a snapshot from a few
>> days ago), and ULP update would also be needed at least on alpha and
>> hppa.
> 
> As per our consensus rules, anyone testing on a platform and with commit 
> access can commit ulps updates for that platform (the test machinery will 
> automatically prevent excessively large values being set in ulps files and 
> ignore such values if they are set there).  One would generally expect 
> architecture maintainers to do so at during the release freeze (before 
> doing the test run for which they report results), but it doesn't have to 
> be the architecture maintainers (and likewise, other people can report 
> results on the per-release wiki page if they wish).
> 
> As recently noted, the "Not currently functional without patches." for 
> hppa needs removing in README, as it's no longer true.
 
I have pushed an update for the README. Thanks for the note.

commit caaf7804e26c1a4f28a1bf7cfe1075d06bce1255
Author: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Date:   Fri Jan 26 09:49:54 2018 -0800

    README: hppa no longer requires patches.


-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]