This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3] New generic cosf


Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> writes:

> On 12/07/2017 11:59 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> The same logic used in s_cosf.S version for x86 and powerpc
>>> is used to create a generic s_cosf.c, so there is no performance
>>> improvement in x86_64 and powerpc64.
>>>
>>> 2017-12-06  Paul A. Clarke  <pc@us.ibm.com>
>>>
>>>         * sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32/s_cosf.c: New implementation.
>> 
>> Please take a look at sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32/math_config.h to see how
>> to share constants between s_cosf.c and s_sinf.c.
>
> I interpreted Joseph's response to your earlier suggestion of the same as it to be acceptable to common these tables and constants into a future submission of a combined sinf/cosf/sincosf.
>
> Raji is looking into that approach.
>
> As for cosf, I figured committing a good cosf now is better than waiting for a perfect sinf/cosf/sincosf.  Unless there are strong objections?

Pushed as f4b2aea6e133.

-- 
Tulio Magno


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]