This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- From: Dave Martin <Dave dot Martin at arm dot com>
- To: Catalin Marinas <catalin dot marinas at arm dot com>
- Cc: linux-arch at vger dot kernel dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard dot biesheuvel at linaro dot org>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org, Yao Qi <Yao dot Qi at arm dot com>, Alan Hayward <alan dot hayward at arm dot com>, Will Deacon <will dot deacon at arm dot com>, Richard Sandiford <richard dot sandiford at arm dot com>, Alex Bennée <alex dot bennee at linaro dot org>, kvmarm at lists dot cs dot columbia dot edu, linux-arm-kernel at lists dot infradead dot org
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 18:04:47 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1504198860-12951-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> <1504198860-12951-15-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> <20170913172911.3ca2h6cpju7etifi@localhost> <20170913190611.GC23415@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> <20170913221123.y4znytmxtplx24m4@localhost> <20171005164229.GX3611@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> <20171005165334.cstx6fszl7shaudg@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 05:53:34PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 05:42:29PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 03:11:23PM -0700, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:29:11AM -0700, Catalin Marinas wrote:
[...]
> > > > > Can this be merged with patch 20? It seems to add the PR_ definitions
> > > > > which get actually used later when the prctl interface is added.
> > > >
> > > > This patch is used both by patch 19 and by patch 20, which I preferred
> > > > not to merge with each other: ptrace and prctl are significantly
> > > > different things.
> > > >
> > > > The prctl bit definitions are added here because they are the canonical
> > > > definitions used by both interfaces. The ptrace #defines are based on
> > > > them.
> > > >
> > > > Does it make sense if I merge patch 20 into this one and apply patch 19
> > > > on top? This avoide the appearance of prctl #defines with no prctl
> > > > implementation.
> > >
> > > That's fine, you can bring patch 20 forward. If there are other
> > > non-trivial issues, feel free to ignore my comment.
> >
> > I've had a go at this, but I think it's going to be more trouble than
> > it's worth -- there are other interdependencies between the patches
> > which make them tricky to reorder.
> >
> > I could add a note in the commit message for this patch explaining why
> > the prctl flag #defines are being added here. What do you think?
>
> As I said, it's up to you. A line in the commit message would do.
OK, I think I'll stick with this then.
Cheers
---Dave