This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Use fabs(f/l) rather than __fabs


On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:

> Right so there are no namespace issues. But what about localplt issues
> due to the disabling of fabsl inlining? I can't find any renaming, so why are
> there no local plt failures on ppc soft-float?

Because both fabsl and copysignl are listed in 
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/nofpu/localplt.data.  If the GCC 
bug is fixed and the -fno-builtin-fabsl use made conditional, then fabsl 
would also need to be marked optional in localplt.data as copysignl is.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]