This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] posix: glob fixes and refactor


On 17/08/2017 11:10, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>> I agree
>> that decoupling should be a better strategy.  I can update the 01/18 with
>> a general cleanup or adding another upcoming patch with this change, which
>> do you think it is better?
> 
> I'd like to keep the code in sync as much as possible. Perhaps the best way to do this would be for you to present the "decoupled" version, then I can attempt to merge the Gnulib-needed changes into it, in such a way that they don't disrupt the mainline code.

My understanding from Florian comment is the 'decoupled' version would be the
code with both win32/amiga/etc code striped and LIBC defines set to only glibc.
Would it be acceptable for gnulib?
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]